Justia Mississippi Supreme Court Opinion Summaries

After an evening involving alcohol, three men—Keith, his brother Dannie, and Bryant—traveled together in Dannie’s truck. The next morning, Bryant was found in the road with a fatal head injury. During the investigation, Dannie provided law enforcement with inconsistent stories but eventually stated that Keith struck Bryant on the head with a club-like object during an argument, after which Bryant did not recover. A search of Dannie’s truck revealed an object matching Dannie’s description. Other witnesses corroborated that the three men left together and that Bryant did not return. The medical examiner concluded that Bryant’s death was a homicide caused by blunt-force trauma.The Copiah County Circuit Court conducted a jury trial. The prosecution introduced autopsy photographs over defense objections, and Dannie testified, admitting his own inconsistent statements. The jury found Keith guilty of second-degree murder but deadlocked on sentencing, resulting in a statutorily mandated thirty-year sentence.On appeal to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, Keith challenged the admission of certain autopsy photographs, the sufficiency of the evidence (arguing that Dannie’s testimony was unreliable), and the propriety of the jury instructions on depraved-heart murder and culpable-negligence manslaughter. The Supreme Court of Mississippi held that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the photographs, as they supplemented the pathologist’s testimony and were probative given the disputed manner of death. The Court found that the jury was entitled to judge Dannie’s credibility and that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. The Court also determined that the jury instructions, considered as a whole, properly explained the hierarchy and definitions of the offenses. Any possible error in the manslaughter instructions was deemed harmless, as the jury convicted Keith of murder. The Supreme Court of Mississippi affirmed Keith’s conviction and sentence. View "Goods v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

On the night of May 26, 2023, Undra Williams entered the Inferno Sports Bar and Nightclub in Columbus, Mississippi, where he was seen on surveillance footage wearing orange and blue. After an initial exchange of words with Devan Thompson, Williams left and later returned to the club. Witnesses testified that Williams drew a gun and shot Thompson multiple times, resulting in Thompson’s death. Three bystanders suffered gunshot wounds. Several witnesses, some of whom personally knew Williams, identified him both in surveillance footage and in court as the shooter. Nine shell casings were recovered from the scene, but the weapon was never found. Williams turned himself in two days later.After a jury trial in the Lowndes County Circuit Court, Williams was convicted of first-degree murder and three counts of aggravated assault. The State retired a fourth count of aggravated assault. Williams was sentenced to life imprisonment for the murder and three consecutive twenty-year terms for the aggravated assault convictions. His post-trial motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, or alternatively for a new trial, was denied by the Circuit Court.On appeal to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, Williams argued that the convictions were against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, citing unreliable eyewitness testimony and a lack of physical evidence. The Supreme Court of Mississippi held that the convictions were supported by compelling testimonial and video evidence and that it is within the jury’s province to resolve questions of witness credibility and evidentiary weight. The Court found no abuse of discretion by the trial court in denying the motion for a new trial and affirmed Williams’s convictions and sentences. View "Williams v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

On September 16, 2022, a police report was filed following the theft of a Glock 42 firearm stamped with the name “Hendricks.” Security footage led authorities to identify Tavion Pegues as the perpetrator, and an arrest warrant was issued. On February 8, 2023, law enforcement arrested Pegues at his sister’s home, where they recovered two firearms from a bedroom that Pegues occasionally used. Pegues’s sister testified that the firearms and associated items found in her son’s bedroom did not belong to her or her family, but belonged to Pegues, who often stayed there. Photographs and videos retrieved from Pegues’s cellphone showed him possessing one of the firearms shortly before the search. Pegues was indicted for armed robbery, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possession of a stolen firearm, but the State proceeded only on the possession charge.The case was tried in the Circuit Court of Oktibbeha County, where a jury found Pegues guilty of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Pegues was sentenced as a habitual offender to life without parole. He subsequently moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, but the trial court denied his motion.On appeal, the Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed Pegues’s claims of prosecutorial misconduct and insufficiency of the evidence regarding constructive possession. The Court held that the State’s comments about Pegues’s failure to call his mother and nephew as witnesses, and its reference to his right to a trial, were not plain error because Pegues’s family members were more available to him than to the State, and the evidence against him was overwhelming. The Court also found the evidence sufficient to prove constructive possession, given Pegues’s connection to the firearms and the items found with them. The conviction and sentence were affirmed. View "Pegues v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

A man was stopped by a police officer for a window tint violation while riding as a passenger in a vehicle driven by a family acquaintance. During the stop, the officer observed behavior from the man that suggested narcotics use. The officer searched a bag in the vehicle, which the man identified as his, and found what appeared to be crystal methamphetamine and a used methamphetamine pipe. The man was arrested at the scene, and the driver left. The man was subsequently indicted for possession of methamphetamine, and at trial, he testified that the drugs were not his and that he did not know the driver well, though she was a family friend.At trial in the Circuit Court of Madison County, the State presented evidence including the testimony of the arresting officer and a crime lab analyst. The defendant’s only witness was himself. In closing argument, the prosecutor highlighted that the defendant, who blamed the drugs on the driver, had not called her as a witness, even though she was known to him and accessible through family. The jury found the defendant guilty, and the trial court denied post-trial motions for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.On appeal to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, the defendant argued that the prosecutor’s comments in closing were improper because they referenced his failure to call the driver as a witness. The Supreme Court reviewed the claim for plain error, since no objection was made at trial. The Court held that there was no error because the witness was more available to the defendant than to the State, given her relationship to the defendant’s family. The conviction and sentence were affirmed. View "Hollingsworth v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

In December 2022, Mariah Karriem was attacked outside a hookah lounge in Lowndes County, Mississippi by three individuals, including Kierra Wallace, her sister, and her cousin. Karriem was punched, kicked, and struck several times with a glass bottle, sustaining minor injuries that required minimal medical treatment. The attack was recorded on video, and Karriem later identified her assailants as they fled the scene. A longer video of the incident and a Facebook Live recording of Wallace and her sister admitting to the assault were admitted into evidence.The case was tried before the Lowndes County Circuit Court, where the jury found Wallace guilty of aggravated assault. She was sentenced to twenty years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections, with five years suspended and five years of post-release supervision. Following sentencing, Wallace filed a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, arguing, among other things, that newly discovered video evidence exculpated her. The trial court held a hearing and found the new video was cumulative of evidence already presented and not exculpatory, denying the motion.On appeal, the Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed Wallace’s claims regarding a defective indictment, constructive amendment of the indictment, sufficiency of the evidence, and denial of the motion for a new trial. The Court held that the indictment was not defective, as it did not conflate intent elements and Wallace’s defense was not prejudiced. The Court found Wallace was estopped from challenging a jury instruction due to the invited-error doctrine. Reviewing the evidence de novo, the Court found it sufficient for a rational juror to convict. It also held the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying a new trial. The conviction was affirmed. View "Wallace v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

A commercial truck driver was stopped by police in Rankin County, Mississippi, for speeding and following too closely. During the stop, the officer noticed the driver was using paper logs instead of the electronic logs typically required for commercial vehicles, and observed inconsistencies in the logs. The driver, after initial denials, admitted to having over $100,000 in the vehicle, later specifying it was $225,000, which he claimed was for truck repairs or his life savings. The officer obtained consent to search the vehicle and found the cash packaged in multiple envelopes. Further investigation linked phone numbers provided by the driver to ongoing federal drug-trafficking investigations, and a trained narcotics dog showed interest in the cash. The State initiated civil forfeiture proceedings, alleging the money was connected to illegal drug activity.The Circuit Court of Rankin County held a bench trial, heard testimony from law enforcement and an expert in drug trafficking, and issued an order of forfeiture, finding by a preponderance of the evidence that the cash was connected to drug trafficking. The driver appealed, and the Mississippi Court of Appeals, in a split decision, reversed the trial court, concluding the State had not met its burden of proof under the relevant forfeiture statute.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case on certiorari. Applying the substantial evidence/clearly erroneous standard, the court found that the trial court’s findings were supported by sufficient circumstantial evidence, including the manner of cash packaging, travel patterns, phone records, and the narcotics dog’s alert. The Supreme Court of Mississippi reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals and reinstated and affirmed the judgment of the Circuit Court, holding that the State had met its burden to show the currency was more likely than not connected to illegal drug activity and thus subject to forfeiture. View "Chung v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

Carlos Jones, Jr. was convicted of attempted aggravated assault after an incident in which he became angry when a neighbor’s visitor honked a car horn, waking him from sleep. Jones confronted his neighbor, Niesha Russell, and after a verbal argument, retrieved a gun from a car, pointed it at Russell, and fired two shots as she fled toward her house. Russell testified that she saw Jones point the gun at her and heard the shots as she ran, though she was not injured. Jones left the scene immediately after the shooting. He later told police that he had fired into the air rather than at Russell.The case was tried in the Circuit Court of Coahoma County, where the State charged Jones with attempted aggravated assault. At trial, the jury heard testimony from Russell and law enforcement. Jones moved for a directed verdict, arguing that the evidence did not show he intended to harm Russell, but the motion was denied. The jury found Jones guilty, and he was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment, with three years to serve and two years of supervised probation. After his motion for a new trial was denied, Jones appealed.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the conviction. The court held that, when viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, a rational juror could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that Jones intended to shoot Russell, based on the circumstantial evidence that he pointed the gun at her and fired. The court also found that the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence, as the jury was entitled to resolve conflicting testimony regarding Jones’s intent. The Supreme Court of Mississippi affirmed the conviction and sentence. View "Jones v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

Late one night, a man called police twice, claiming he was being chased, and was found by officers pounding on a homeowner’s door in Beaumont, Mississippi. The man appeared erratic and admitted to drinking. He gave police permission to search his vehicle, which he referred to as “his” car. Inside, officers found a sunglasses case on the dashboard containing a glass pipe and a bag of methamphetamine. While being transported to jail, the man remarked that he “should have gotten rid of that shit before [he] called” the police. Subsequent testing confirmed the substance was methamphetamine, and he was indicted for possession of more than one-tenth gram but less than two grams of a Schedule II controlled substance.The case was tried in the Perry County Circuit Court, where a jury found the defendant guilty of possession of methamphetamine. The court sentenced him to three years in the custody of the Mississippi Department of Corrections. The defendant appealed, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to prove he constructively possessed the methamphetamine and that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case. Applying the standard of viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the State, the court held that a rational juror could find the defendant exercised dominion and control over the vehicle and knew about the methamphetamine, especially given his statements and behavior. The court distinguished this case from Ferrell v. State, 649 So. 2d 831 (Miss. 1995), finding additional incriminating circumstances beyond mere proximity. The court concluded that the evidence was sufficient and the verdict was not against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. The conviction and sentence were affirmed. View "Moody v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

An employee at a dental clinic within a correctional facility alleged that she was sexually assaulted by an inmate while working in her office. The incident occurred when the inmate entered her office, closed the door, and, according to her testimony, physically restrained and sexually assaulted her. The victim immediately reported the incident to her supervisor and underwent a forensic examination, which revealed DNA evidence consistent with the inmate being the primary contributor. The inmate claimed the encounter was consensual and that he and the victim had a prior relationship, but no evidence supported this assertion.The Circuit Court of Rankin County presided over the trial, during which the jury found the inmate guilty of sexual battery. The court sentenced him to thirty years’ imprisonment as a habitual offender. The defendant filed post-trial motions for a new trial or judgment notwithstanding the verdict, arguing insufficient evidence and that the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. The trial court denied these motions, leading to the present appeal.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case, applying a de novo standard to the sufficiency of the evidence and an abuse-of-discretion standard to the weight of the evidence. The court held that the evidence, including the victim’s testimony and supporting forensic findings, was sufficient for a rational jury to find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The court also found that the verdict was not so contrary to the weight of the evidence as to constitute an injustice. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of Mississippi affirmed the conviction, sentence, and denial of post-trial motions. View "Mayfield v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law

The case concerns an altercation in an apartment between Sapireya Smith and Denise Neely. Smith, her boyfriend, and her brother shared the apartment, and Neely, who was married to Smith’s brother, entered to help him collect his belongings. A verbal argument between Smith and Neely escalated, culminating in Smith striking Neely in the head with a frying pan. Neely sustained significant injuries, including a fractured orbital bone and a deep laceration, requiring medical treatment and surgery. Smith admitted to throwing the pan but denied beating Neely with it, while another witness, Smith’s boyfriend, claimed not to have seen the fight’s initiation.The Circuit Court of Oktibbeha County conducted a jury trial, during which two of Neely’s treating physicians testified as lay witnesses about Neely’s injuries and treatment. Smith did not object to their testimony at trial. The jury found Smith guilty of aggravated assault, and she was sentenced to ten years in prison. Smith appealed, arguing that the physicians’ testimony constituted improper expert opinion and that her counsel was ineffective for failing to object.The Supreme Court of Mississippi reviewed the case. It found that while some of the treating nurse practitioner’s testimony about potential future complications from Neely’s injuries exceeded the permissible scope of lay opinion, the error was harmless given the overwhelming evidence of aggravated assault. The court also held that the radiologist’s testimony was permissible as lay opinion based on his direct observations and medical records. Regarding ineffective assistance of counsel, the court determined that the failure to object did not amount to constitutional ineffectiveness, as the decisions fell within trial strategy and did not prejudice Smith’s defense. The Supreme Court of Mississippi affirmed Smith’s conviction. View "Smith v. State of Mississippi" on Justia Law